Difference between revisions of "Rectal cancer"
Warner-admin (talk | contribs) m (Text replacement - " continuous infusion for 5 days, started " to " continuous infusion over 120 hours, started ") |
Ariseifter (talk | contribs) m (Updated ESMO and ESIO guidelines) Tag: visualeditor |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%;" | {| class="wikitable" style="text-align:center; width:50%;" | ||
− | ! | + | ! style="color:white; font-size:125%; background-color:#08519c" align="center" colspan="2" |'''Section editor''' |
|- | |- | ||
− | |style="background-color:#F0F0F0"|[[File:nkv.jpg|frameless|upright=0.3|center]] | + | | style="background-color:#F0F0F0" |[[File:nkv.jpg|frameless|upright=0.3|center]] |
|<big>[[User:Neetavenepalli|Neeta K. Venepalli, MD, MBA]]<br>University of Illinois at Chicago<br>Chicago, IL</big> | |<big>[[User:Neetavenepalli|Neeta K. Venepalli, MD, MBA]]<br>University of Illinois at Chicago<br>Chicago, IL</big> | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
==[http://www.esmo.org/ ESMO]== | ==[http://www.esmo.org/ ESMO]== | ||
*'''2017:''' Glynne-Jones et al. [https://www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Rectal-Cancer Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up] | *'''2017:''' Glynne-Jones et al. [https://www.esmo.org/Guidelines/Gastrointestinal-Cancers/Rectal-Cancer Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up] | ||
+ | **'''[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/29/Supplement_4/iv263/4993206 2018 addendum]''' | ||
===Older=== | ===Older=== | ||
*'''2013:''' Glimelius et al. [http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/suppl_6/vi81.full.pdf+html Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up] [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24078665 PubMed] | *'''2013:''' Glimelius et al. [http://annonc.oxfordjournals.org/content/24/suppl_6/vi81.full.pdf+html Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up] [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24078665 PubMed] | ||
Line 24: | Line 25: | ||
==SIOG== | ==SIOG== | ||
− | *''' | + | *'''2018''': Montroni, Isacco et al. [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798318312721?via%3Dihub Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.] |
=Neoadjuvant therapy= | =Neoadjuvant therapy= | ||
Line 36: | Line 37: | ||
===Variant #1, continuous capecitabine {{#subobject:a05392|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, continuous capecitabine {{#subobject:a05392|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 20%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.25943 Park et al. 2011] | |[https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/cncr.25943 Park et al. 2011] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT_2|Adjuvant Capecitabine & RT]] | |[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT_2|Adjuvant Capecitabine & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 49: | Line 50: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|5-FU & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|5-FU & RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
| | | | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|1. 5-FU & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|1. 5-FU & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Similar toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Similar toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
|2. CapeOx & RT<br> [[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|3. FUOX & RT]] | |2. CapeOx & RT<br> [[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|3. FUOX & RT]] | ||
Line 75: | Line 76: | ||
===Variant #2, interrupted capecitabine {{#subobject:19cc2a|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, interrupted capecitabine {{#subobject:19cc2a|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376 Gérard et al. 2010 (ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.8376 Gérard et al. 2010 (ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|CapeOx & RT | |CapeOx & RT | ||
− | |style="background-color:#fee08b"|Might have inferior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#fee08b" |Might have inferior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 110: | Line 111: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:a01232|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:a01232|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 50%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 50%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(17)31402-8/fulltext von Moos et al. 2017 (SAKK 41/08)] | |[https://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(17)31402-8/fulltext von Moos et al. 2017 (SAKK 41/08)] | ||
Line 137: | Line 138: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:205ad6|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:205ad6|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 50%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 50%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(09)70381-X/fulltext Chua et al. 2010] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(09)70381-X/fulltext Chua et al. 2010] | ||
Line 163: | Line 164: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:5a3ef0|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:5a3ef0|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 50%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 50%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 50%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 50%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.clinical-colorectal-cancer.com/article/S1533-0028(17)30061-0/fulltext Leichman et al. 2017 (SWOG S0713)] | |[https://www.clinical-colorectal-cancer.com/article/S1533-0028(17)30061-0/fulltext Leichman et al. 2017 (SWOG S0713)] | ||
Line 195: | Line 196: | ||
===Variant #1, continuous {{#subobject:5801b6|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, continuous {{#subobject:5801b6|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 20%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|FUOX & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|FUOX & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.9597 Ngan et al. 2012 (TTROG 01.014)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.9597 Ngan et al. 2012 (TTROG 01.014)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Radiation_therapy|Short-course RT]] | |[[#Radiation_therapy|Short-course RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Similar toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Similar toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|1. Capecitabine & RT]] | |[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|1. Capecitabine & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Similar toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Similar toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
|2. CapeOx & RT<br> [[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|3. FUOX & RT]] | |2. CapeOx & RT<br> [[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|3. FUOX & RT]] | ||
Line 236: | Line 237: | ||
===Variant #2, intermittent {{#subobject:3c5452|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, intermittent {{#subobject:3c5452|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa040694 Sauer et al. 2004 (CAO/ARO/AIO-94)] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa040694 Sauer et al. 2004 (CAO/ARO/AIO-94)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Adjuvant 5-FU & RT | |Adjuvant 5-FU & RT | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior five-year cumulative incidence of local relapse | + | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior five-year cumulative incidence of local relapse |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|Capecitabine & RT]] | |[[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|Capecitabine & RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Oxaliplatin.2C_RT|Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 285: | Line 286: | ||
===Variant #1, 800/200 ("Nordic schedule") {{#subobject:3780c0|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, 800/200 ("Nordic schedule") {{#subobject:3780c0|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858 Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858 Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | |[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
Line 308: | Line 309: | ||
===Variant #2, 1625/100 {{#subobject:0160e1|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, 1625/100 {{#subobject:0160e1|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773471/ Roh et al. 2009 (NSABP R-03)] | |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2773471/ Roh et al. 2009 (NSABP R-03)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|Postoperative chemoradiotherapy]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|Postoperative chemoradiotherapy]] | ||
| style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior OS | | style="background-color:#d9ef8b" |Might have superior OS | ||
Line 332: | Line 333: | ||
===Variant #3, 1750/100 {{#subobject:7d3ec1|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #3, 1750/100 {{#subobject:7d3ec1|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629 Gérard et al. 2006 (FFCD 9203)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2006.06.7629 Gérard et al. 2006 (FFCD 9203)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | |[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa060829 Bosset et al. 2006 (EORTC 22921)] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa060829 Bosset et al. 2006 (EORTC 22921)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | |[[#Radiation_therapy|Radiotherapy]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
Line 366: | Line 367: | ||
===Variant #4, 2800/400 {{#subobject:98d3ca|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #4, 2800/400 {{#subobject:98d3ca|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/34/27/3300.full Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/34/27/3300.full Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (C) |
|1. mFOLFOX6 | |1. mFOLFOX6 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|[[#mFOLFOX6_.26_RT|2. mFOLFOX6 & RT]] | |[[#mFOLFOX6_.26_RT|2. mFOLFOX6 & RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 409: | Line 410: | ||
===Variant #1, 225/50 {{#subobject:66269c|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, 225/50 {{#subobject:66269c|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 20%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4050205/ O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|1. 5-FU & RT]]<br> [[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|2. Capecitabine & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|1. 5-FU & RT]]<br> [[#Capecitabine_.26_RT|2. Capecitabine & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
|3. CapeOx & RT | |3. CapeOx & RT | ||
Line 439: | Line 440: | ||
===Variant #2, 225/60 {{#subobject:0b1c02|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, 225/60 {{#subobject:0b1c02|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 20%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 20%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
− | !style="width: 20%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] | + | ! style="width: 20%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Toxicity|Toxicity]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.34.4911 Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|Fluorouracil & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|Fluorouracil & RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d73027"|Inferior toxicity | + | | style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior toxicity |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 464: | Line 465: | ||
===Variant #3, 250/50 {{#subobject:858489|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #3, 250/50 {{#subobject:858489|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|Fluorouracil & RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_RT|Fluorouracil & RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 500: | Line 501: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:9bf2ab|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:9bf2ab|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/34/27/3300.full Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/34/27/3300.full Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Folinic_acid.2C_RT|1. Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Folinic_acid.2C_RT|1. Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, RT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior pCR rate | + | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior pCR rate |
|- | |- | ||
|2. mFOLFOX6 | |2. mFOLFOX6 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported | + | | style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 536: | Line 537: | ||
===Variant #1, 25 Gy {{#subobject:9abcab|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, 25 Gy {{#subobject:9abcab|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199704033361402 Cedermark et al. 1997 (Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial)] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199704033361402 Cedermark et al. 1997 (Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Surgery alone | |Surgery alone | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior OS | + | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Kapiteijn et al. 2001] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa010580 Kapiteijn et al. 2001] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Surgery alone | |Surgery alone | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9850"|Superior local recurrence rate | + | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior local recurrence rate |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668947/ Sebag-Montefiore et al. 2009 (MRC CR07; NCIC CTG CO.16)] | |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2668947/ Sebag-Montefiore et al. 2009 (MRC CR07; NCIC CTG CO.16)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|Selective postoperative 5-FU & RT | |Selective postoperative 5-FU & RT | ||
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior DFS | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior DFS | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/27/5/834/2769824 Bujko et al. 2016 (PGBRJG0109)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/27/5/834/2769824 Bujko et al. 2016 (PGBRJG0109)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|5-FU, LV, RT, +/- oxaliplatin | |5-FU, LV, RT, +/- oxaliplatin | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
Line 573: | Line 574: | ||
===Variant #2, 40 Gy {{#subobject:8b0799|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, 40 Gy {{#subobject:8b0799|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)05348-2/fulltext Oates et al. 1996] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)05348-2/fulltext Oates et al. 1996] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Surgery alone | |Surgery alone | ||
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior DFS | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior DFS | ||
Line 594: | Line 595: | ||
===Variant #3, 50 Gy {{#subobject:159853|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #3, 50 Gy {{#subobject:159853|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858 Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS)] | |[http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.3858 Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Folinic_acid.2C_RT|5-FU, LV, RT]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_Folinic_acid.2C_RT|5-FU, LV, RT]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior (*) | ||
Line 630: | Line 631: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:4e5ce4|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:4e5ce4|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_monotherapy|Fluorouracil]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_monotherapy|Fluorouracil]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Observation|Observation]] | |[[#Observation|Observation]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 666: | Line 667: | ||
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:66d35a|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1 {{#subobject:66d35a|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Capecitabine_monotherapy|Capecitabine]] | |[[#Capecitabine_monotherapy|Capecitabine]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 686: | Line 687: | ||
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:38a90a|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2 {{#subobject:38a90a|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#FOLFOX|FOLFOX]] | |[[#FOLFOX|FOLFOX]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported | + | | style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 716: | Line 717: | ||
===Variant #1, 500/500 {{#subobject:cc7508|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, 500/500 {{#subobject:cc7508|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/92/5/388/2606692 Wolmark et al. 2000 (NSABP R-02)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/92/5/388/2606692 Wolmark et al. 2000 (NSABP R-02)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|Chemoradiation | |Chemoradiation | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 737: | Line 738: | ||
===Variant #2, 1000/120 ("Nordic regimen") {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, 1000/120 ("Nordic regimen") {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Observation|Observation]] | |[[#Observation|Observation]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 759: | Line 760: | ||
===Variant #3, 1900/100 {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #3, 1900/100 {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(14)70377-8/abstract Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(14)70377-8/abstract Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (C) |
|[[#FOLFOX|FOLFOX]] | |[[#FOLFOX|FOLFOX]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior DFS | + | | style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior DFS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 781: | Line 782: | ||
===Variant #4, 2125/100 ("Mayo regimen") {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #4, 2125/100 ("Mayo regimen") {{#subobject:9df33b|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Observation|Observation]] | |[[#Observation|Observation]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/6/1208/161972 Delbaldo et al. 2015 (R98)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/6/1208/161972 Delbaldo et al. 2015 (R98)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|FOLFIRI | |FOLFIRI | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 821: | Line 822: | ||
===Variant #1 {{#subobject:f31fc0|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1 {{#subobject:f31fc0|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(14)70377-8/abstract Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(14)70377-8/abstract Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Randomized Phase II (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Randomized Phase II (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_Folinic_acid|Fluorouracil & 5-FU]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_Folinic_acid|Fluorouracil & 5-FU]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior DFS | + | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior DFS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 843: | Line 844: | ||
===Variant #2 {{#subobject:f3300f|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2 {{#subobject:f3300f|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045(12)70187-0/abstract Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_monotherapy|Fluorouracil]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_monotherapy|Fluorouracil]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#d3d3d3"|Not reported | + | | style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 876: | Line 877: | ||
===Regimen=== | ===Regimen=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=3|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198506063122301 Mittelman et al. 1985] | + | | rowspan="3" |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM198506063122301 Mittelman et al. 1985] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="3" |Phase III (C) |
|5-FU & Semustine | |5-FU & Semustine | ||
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported | | style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported | ||
Line 903: | Line 904: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Fluorouracil_.26_Folinic_acid|5-FU & LV]] | |[[#Fluorouracil_.26_Folinic_acid|5-FU & LV]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT)] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/26/4/696/203767 Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Capecitabine_monotherapy|Capecitabine]] | |[[#Capecitabine_monotherapy|Capecitabine]] | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 932: | Line 933: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:0ee98c|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:0ee98c|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC)] | |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#UFT_monotherapy|UFT]] | |[[#UFT_monotherapy|UFT]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#91cf60"|Seems to have superior RFS | + | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior RFS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 963: | Line 964: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:7dc55c|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:7dc55c|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00280-010-1358-1 Hamaguchi et al. 2010 (NSAS-CC)] | |[https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00280-010-1358-1 Hamaguchi et al. 2010 (NSAS-CC)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Surgery alone | |Surgery alone | ||
| style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS (*) | | style="background-color:#91cf60" |Seems to have superior OS (*) | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC)] | |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4922318/ Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#S-1_monotherapy|S-1]] | |[[#S-1_monotherapy|S-1]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#fc8d59"|Seems to have inferior RFS | + | | style="background-color:#fc8d59" |Seems to have inferior RFS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,003: | Line 1,004: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:2028c1|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:2028c1|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,043: | Line 1,044: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:5ea375|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:5ea375|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041927/ Feng et al. 2016 (CAMS_rectal cancer_01)] | |[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5041927/ Feng et al. 2016 (CAMS_rectal cancer_01)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|CapeOx & RT | |CapeOx & RT | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 1,073: | Line 1,074: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:e903ad|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:e903ad|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/10/6/671/155243 Fountzilas et al. 1999] | |[https://academic.oup.com/annonc/article/10/6/671/155243 Fountzilas et al. 1999] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|5-FU & LV, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU & LV | |5-FU & LV, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU & LV | ||
| style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior | ||
Line 1,100: | Line 1,101: | ||
===Variant #1, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (450 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) {{#subobject:d06581|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #1, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (450 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) {{#subobject:d06581|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199408253310803 O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751)] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199408253310803 O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | |Bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | ||
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior OS | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/22/3542.long Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/22/3542.long Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|1. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | |1. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|2. CI 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU | |2. CI 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,140: | Line 1,141: | ||
===Variant #2, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) {{#subobject:23bcde|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #2, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m<sup>2</sup>) {{#subobject:23bcde|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/PIIS1470-2045%2812%2970116-X/fulltext Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#Capecitabine.2C_then_Capecitabine_.26_RT.2C_then_Capecitabine|Capecitabine, then Capecitabine & RT, then Capecitabine]] | |[[#Capecitabine.2C_then_Capecitabine_.26_RT.2C_then_Capecitabine|Capecitabine, then Capecitabine & RT, then Capecitabine]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#eeee01"|Non-inferior OS | + | | style="background-color:#eeee01" |Non-inferior OS |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,171: | Line 1,172: | ||
===Variant #3, CI 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU {{#subobject:da8c0d|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #3, CI 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU {{#subobject:da8c0d|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/22/3542.long Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/24/22/3542.long Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|1. Bolus 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU | |1. Bolus 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|2. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | |2. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,205: | Line 1,206: | ||
===Variant #4, bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU {{#subobject:3d1b7b|Variant=1}}=== | ===Variant #4, bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU {{#subobject:3d1b7b|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199408253310803 O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751)] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199408253310803 O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751)] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|Bolus 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | |Bolus 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | ||
| style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior OS | | style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior OS | ||
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=3|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/15/5/2030.long Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114)] | + | | rowspan="3" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/15/5/2030.long Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="3" |Phase III (C) |
|[[#5-FU_.26_Leucovorin.2C_then_5-FU.2C_Leucovorin.2C_RT.2C_then_5-FU_.26_Leucovorin|1. 5-FU & Leucovorin, then 5-FU, Leucovorin, RT, then 5-FU & Leucovorin]] | |[[#5-FU_.26_Leucovorin.2C_then_5-FU.2C_Leucovorin.2C_RT.2C_then_5-FU_.26_Leucovorin|1. 5-FU & Leucovorin, then 5-FU, Leucovorin, RT, then 5-FU & Leucovorin]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|2. Levamisole combination #1 | |2. Levamisole combination #1 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|3. Levamisole combination #2 | |3. Levamisole combination #2 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,261: | Line 1,262: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:cd06ac|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:cd06ac|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=3|[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/15/5/2030.long Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114)] | + | | rowspan="3" |[http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/15/5/2030.long Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="3" |Phase III (E) |
|[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|1. 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU]] | |[[#Fluorouracil.2C_then_Fluorouracil_.26_RT.2C_then_Fluorouracil|1. 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU]] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|2. Levamisole combination #1 | |2. Levamisole combination #1 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|3. Levamisole combination #2 | |3. Levamisole combination #2 | ||
− | |style="background-color:#ffffbf"|Seems not superior | + | | style="background-color:#ffffbf" |Seems not superior |
|- | |- | ||
|} | |} | ||
Line 1,311: | Line 1,312: | ||
===Regimen {{#subobject:f7cd24|Variant=1}}=== | ===Regimen {{#subobject:f7cd24|Variant=1}}=== | ||
{| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | {| class="wikitable" style="width: 100%; text-align:center;" | ||
− | !style="width: 25%"|Study | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Study |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Evidence|Evidence]] |
− | !style="width: 25%"|Comparator | + | ! style="width: 25%" |Comparator |
− | !style="width: 25%"|[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] | + | ! style="width: 25%" |[[Levels_of_Evidence#Efficacy|Efficacy]] |
|- | |- | ||
− | |rowspan=2|[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-abstract/80/1/21/886000 Fisher et al. 1988 (NSABP R-01)] | + | | rowspan="2" |[https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article-abstract/80/1/21/886000 Fisher et al. 1988 (NSABP R-01)] |
− | | | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" rowspan="2" |Phase III (E) |
|1. MOF | |1. MOF | ||
| style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported | | style="background-color:#d3d3d3" |Not reported | ||
Line 1,325: | Line 1,326: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM199103143241101 Krook et al. 1991] | |[https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJM199103143241101 Krook et al. 1991] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (C) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (C) |
|Fluorouracil & RT | |Fluorouracil & RT | ||
| style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior RFS | | style="background-color:#d73027" |Inferior RFS | ||
|- | |- | ||
|[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)05349-4/fulltext Amott et al. 1996] | |[https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(96)05349-4/fulltext Amott et al. 1996] | ||
− | |style="background-color:#1a9851"|Phase III (E) | + | | style="background-color:#1a9851" |Phase III (E) |
|Surgery alone | |Surgery alone | ||
| style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior local recurrence rate | | style="background-color:#1a9850" |Superior local recurrence rate |
Revision as of 21:47, 11 March 2019
Section editor | |
---|---|
Neeta K. Venepalli, MD, MBA University of Illinois at Chicago Chicago, IL |
Note: the page has regimens specific to rectal cancer. Please see the colon cancer page for regimens specific to colon cancer as well as regimens intended more generically for colorectal cancer (e.g., adjuvant CapeOx).
22 regimens on this page
48 variants on this page
|
Guidelines
ESMO
- 2017: Glynne-Jones et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up
Older
- 2013: Glimelius et al. Rectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up PubMed
NCCN
SIOG
- 2018: Montroni, Isacco et al. Personalized management of elderly patients with rectal cancer: Expert recommendations of the European Society of Surgical Oncology, European Society of Coloproctology, International Society of Geriatric Oncology, and American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.
Neoadjuvant therapy
Capecitabine & RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, continuous capecitabine
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy | Toxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Park et al. 2011 | Phase III (E) | Adjuvant Capecitabine & RT | Seems not superior | Superior sphincter preservation |
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (E) | 5-FU & RT | Non-inferior OS | |
O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04) | Phase III (E) | 1. 5-FU & RT | Seems not superior | Similar toxicity |
2. CapeOx & RT 3. FUOX & RT |
Seems not superior | Superior toxicity |
Chemoradiotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 825 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 38
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
One course
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then adjuvant capecitabine
Variant #2, interrupted capecitabine
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Gérard et al. 2010 (ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2) | Phase III (C) | CapeOx & RT | Might have inferior pCR rate |
Note: adjuvant therapy was not specified.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 800 mg/m2 PO twice per day five days per week, on days of radiotherapy
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 45 Gy total in 25 fractions
One course
Subsequent treatment
References
- ACCORD 12: Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Laffay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, Vendrely V, François E, de La Roche G, Bouché O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah JF, Mahé MA, Bécouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Montoto-Grillot C, Conroy T. Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405-PRODIGE 2. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1638-44. Epub 2010 Mar 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S, Martel-Lafay I, Hennequin C, Etienne PL, Vendrely V, François E, de La Roche G, Bouché O, Mirabel X, Denis B, Mineur L, Berdah JF, Mahé MA, Bécouarn Y, Dupuis O, Lledo G, Seitz JF, Bedenne L, Juzyna B, Conroy T. Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec 20;30(36):4558-65. Epub 2012 Oct 29. link to original article PubMed
- Park JH, Yoon SM, Yu CS, Kim JH, Kim TW, Kim JC. Randomized phase 3 trial comparing preoperative and postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine for locally advanced rectal cancer. Cancer. 2011 Aug 15;117(16):3703-12. Epub 2011 Feb 15. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- NSABP R-04: O'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. Epub 2014 May 5. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, Beart RW, Wozniak TF, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori G, Eakle JF, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Sharif S, Roh MS, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant 5-FU or capecitabine plus radiation with or without oxaliplatin in rectal cancer patients: a phase III randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11). Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr;108(4). link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
Capecitabine, Sorafenib, RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence |
---|---|
von Moos et al. 2017 (SAKK 41/08) | Phase I/II |
Note: this regimen was intended for KRAS-mutated rectal cancer.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 825 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 33
- Sorafenib (Nexavar) 400 mg PO once per day
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 45 Gy total
5-week course
Subsequent treatment
References
- SAKK 41/08: von Moos R, Koeberle D, Schacher S, Hayoz S, Winterhalder RC, Roth A, Bodoky G, Samaras P, Berger MD, Rauch D, Saletti P, Plasswilm L, Zwahlen D, Meier UR, Yan P, Izzo P, Klingbiel D, Bärtschi D, Zaugg K; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). Neoadjuvant radiotherapy combined with capecitabine and sorafenib in patients with advanced KRAS-mutated rectal cancer: A phase I/II trial (SAKK 41/08). Eur J Cancer. 2018 Jan;89:82-89. Epub 2017 Dec 11. link to original article PubMed
CapeOx
back to top |
CapeOX: Capecitabine & OXaliplatin
Regimen
Study | Evidence |
---|---|
Chua et al. 2010 | Phase II |
Chemotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 1000 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 14
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 130 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
21-day cycle for 4 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Capecitabine & RT, then TME
References
- Chua YJ, Barbachano Y, Cunningham D, Oates JR, Brown G, Wotherspoon A, Tait D, Massey A, Tebbutt NC, Chau I. Neoadjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin before chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal excision in MRI-defined poor-risk rectal cancer: a phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2010 Mar;11(3):241-8. Epub 2010 Jan 25. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
CapeOx, Cetuximab, RT
back to top |
CapeOX, Cetuximab, RT: Capecitabine, OXaliplatin, Cetuximab, Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence |
---|---|
Leichman et al. 2017 (SWOG S0713) | Phase II |
Chemotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 825 mg/m2 PO twice per day on Monday to Friday
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) as follows:
- Cycle 1: 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29
- Cycle 2: 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 22, 29
- Cetuximab (Erbitux) as follows:
- Cycle 1: 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1, then 250 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 8, 15, 22, 29
- Cycle 2: 250 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29
- RT 180 cGy in 25 fractions, started with cycle 2
35-day cycle for 2 cycles
Subsequent treatment
References
- SWOG S0713: Leichman CG, McDonough SL, Smalley SR, Billingsley KG, Lenz HJ, Beldner MA, Hezel AF, Velasco MR, Guthrie KA, Blanke CD, Hochster HS. Cetuximab Combined With Induction Oxaliplatin and Capecitabine, Followed by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: SWOG 0713. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2018 Mar;17(1):e121-e125. Epub 2017 Oct 24. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Fluorouracil & RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, continuous
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy | Toxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01) | Phase III (C) | FUOX & RT | Seems not superior (*) | Superior toxicity |
Ngan et al. 2012 (TTROG 01.014) | Phase III (C) | Short-course RT | Seems not superior | Similar toxicity |
O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04) | Phase III (C) | 1. Capecitabine & RT | Seems not superior | Similar toxicity |
2. CapeOx & RT 3. FUOX & RT |
Seems not superior | Superior toxicity |
Note: efficacy for STAR-01 is based on the 2016 update.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion for approximately 6 weeks
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
One course
Subsequent treatment
Variant #2, intermittent
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Sauer et al. 2004 (CAO/ARO/AIO-94) | Phase III (E) | Adjuvant 5-FU & RT | Superior five-year cumulative incidence of local relapse |
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (C) | Capecitabine & RT | Non-inferior OS |
Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) | Phase III (C) | Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, RT | Seems to have inferior pCR rate |
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 120 hours, started on day 1 (total dose per cycle: 5000 mg/m2)
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- CAO/ARO/AIO-94: TME, then adjuvant fluorouracil
References
- CAO/ARO/AIO-94: Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, Rödel C, Wittekind C, Fietkau R, Martus P, Tschmelitsch J, Hager E, Hess CF, Karstens JH, Liersch T, Schmidberger H, Raab R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 21;351(17):1731-40. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Sauer R, Liersch T, Merkel S, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hess C, Becker H, Raab HR, Villanueva MT, Witzigmann H, Wittekind C, Beissbarth T, Rödel C. Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-94 randomized phase III trial after a median follow-up of 11 years. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jun 1;30(16):1926-33. Epub 2012 Apr 23. link to original article PubMed
- STAR-01: Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, Artale S, Tagliagambe A, Ambrosini G, Rosetti P, Bonetti A, Negru ME, Tronconi MC, Luppi G, Silvano G, Corsi DC, Bochicchio AM, Chiaulon G, Gallo M, Boni L. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2773-80. Epub 2011 May 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Abstract: Carlo Aschele, Sara Lonardi, Luca Cionini, Carmine Pinto, Stefano Sergio Cordio, Gerardo Rosati, Andrea Sartore Bianchi, Angiolo Tagliagambe, Michela Frisinghelli, Vittorina Zagonel, Paola Rosetti, Maria Emanuela Negru, Andrea Bonetti, Maria Chiara Tronconi, Gabriele Luppi, Anna Rita Marsella, Domenico C. Corsi, Anna Maria Bochicchio, Nicoletta Pella, and Luca Boni. Final results of STAR-01: A randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016 34:15_suppl, 3521-3521 link to abstract
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- CAO/ARO/AIO-04: Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Graeven U, Arnold D, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Sülberg H, Wittekind C, Potapov S, Staib L, Hess C, Weigang-Köhler K, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87. Epub 2012 May 23. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Update: Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Wittekind C, Ströbel P, Staib L, Wilhelm M, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R, Liersch T; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. Epub 2015 Jul 15. link to original article PubMed
- TTROG 01.014: Ngan SY, Burmeister B, Fisher RJ, Solomon M, Goldstein D, Joseph D, Ackland SP, Schache D, McClure B, McLachlan SA, McKendrick J, Leong T, Hartopeanu C, Zalcberg J, Mackay J. Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3827-33. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):399. link to original article PubMed
- NSABP R-04: O'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. Epub 2014 May 5. link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, Beart RW, Wozniak TF, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori G, Eakle JF, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Sharif S, Roh MS, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant 5-FU or capecitabine plus radiation with or without oxaliplatin in rectal cancer patients: a phase III randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11). Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr;108(4). link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, 800/200 ("Nordic schedule")
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS) | Phase III (E) | Radiotherapy | Seems not superior (*) |
Note: reported efficacy is based on the 2018 update.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 2, given first, prior to RT
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 100 mg IV once per day on days 1 & 2, given second
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 2 Gy x 25 fractions, total of 50 Gy over 5 weeks
14-day cycle for 3 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then 5-FU & Leucovorin x 8
Variant #2, 1625/100
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Roh et al. 2009 (NSABP R-03) | Phase III (E) | Postoperative chemoradiotherapy | Might have superior OS |
Preceding treatment
- 5-FU & Leucovorin x 1
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 325 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy over 5 weeks
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then 5-FU & Leucovorin x 4
Variant #3, 1750/100
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Gérard et al. 2006 (FFCD 9203) | Phase III (E) | Radiotherapy | Seems not superior (*) |
Bosset et al. 2006 (EORTC 22921) | Phase III (E) | Radiotherapy | Seems not superior (*) |
Sainato et al. 2014 (I-CNR-RT) | Non-randomized portion of RCT |
Note: these trials were negative for the primary endpoint of overall survival, but had much improved local control for the experimental arm.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 350 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 45 Gy over 5 weeks
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- FFCD 9203 & EORTC 22921: Surgery, then adjuvant 5-FU & LV x 2
- I-CNR-RT: Surgery, then adjuvant 5-FU & LV versus no further treatment
Variant #4, 2800/400
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC) | Phase III (C) | 1. mFOLFOX6 | Seems to have superior pCR rate |
2. mFOLFOX6 & RT | Inferior pCR rate |
Note: this regimen is stated to be based on the de Gramont regimen in the manuscript, although the details are different than those in de Gramont et al. 2000.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 48 hours (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
- Concurrent radiation therapy given during cycles 2 to 4: 1.8 to 2.0 Gy once per day Monday through Friday for a total of 23 to 28 fractions over 5 to 6 weeks and a total dose of 46.0 to 50.4 Gy
14-day cycle for 5 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then adjuvant 5-FU & LV x 7
References
- FFCD 9203: Gérard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F, Bouché O, Chapet O, Closon-Dejardin MT, Untereiner M, Leduc B, Francois E, Maurel J, Seitz JF, Buecher B, Mackiewicz R, Ducreux M, Bedenne L. Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4620-5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- EORTC 22921: Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Radosevic-Jelic L, Daban A, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC; EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 14;355(11):1114-23. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 16;357(7):728. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Bosset JF, Calais G, Mineur L, Maingon P, Stojanovic-Rundic S, Bensadoun RJ, Bardet E, Beny A, Ollier JC, Bolla M, Marchal D, Van Laethem JL, Klein V, Giralt J, Clavère P, Glanzmann C, Cellier P, Collette L; EORTC Radiation Oncology Group. Fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: long-term results of the EORTC 22921 randomised study. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):184-90. Epub 2014 Jan 17. link to original article PubMed
- LARCS: Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, Birkemeyer E, Frykholm G, Påhlman L, Wiig JN, Byström P, Bujko K, Glimelius B. Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3687-94. link to original article PubMed
- Update: Brændengen M, Glimelius B. Preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer - Is survival improved? An update of the "Nordic" LARC study in non-resectable cancers. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):392-395. Epub 2018 May 16. link to original article PubMed
- NSABP R-03: Roh MS, Colangelo LH, O'Connell MJ, Yothers G, Deutsch M, Allegra CJ, Kahlenberg MS, Baez-Diaz L, Ursiny CS, Petrelli NJ, Wolmark N. Preoperative multimodality therapy improves disease-free survival in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R-03. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 1;27(31):5124-30. Epub 2009 Sep 21. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
- I-CNR-RT: Sainato A, Cernusco Luna Nunzia V, Valentini V, De Paoli A, Maurizi ER, Lupattelli M, Aristei C, Vidali C, Conti M, Galardi A, Ponticelli P, Friso ML, Iannone T, Osti FM, Manfredi B, Coppola M, Orlandini C, Cionini L. No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT). Radiother Oncol. 2014 Nov;113(2):223-9. Epub 2014 Nov 14. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- FOWARC: Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, Wang L, Chen W, Cui L, Chen D, Cao J, Wei H, Peng X, Huang Z, Cai G, Zhao R, Huang Z, Xu L, Zhou H, Wei Y, Zhang H, Zheng J, Huang Y, Zhou Z, Cai Y, Kang L, Huang M, Peng J, Ren D, Wang J. Modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil and leucovorin with radiation in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the Chinese FOWARC multicenter, open-label, randomized three-arm phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3300-7. Epub 2016 Aug 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Fluorouracil, Oxaliplatin, RT
back to top |
FUOX & RT: FluoroUracil, OXaliplatin, Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, 225/50
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy | Toxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|
O'Connell et al. 2014 (NSABP R-04) | Phase III (E) | 1. 5-FU & RT 2. Capecitabine & RT |
Seems not superior | Inferior toxicity |
3. CapeOx & RT | Seems not superior | Similar toxicity |
Note: this is an experimental arm that did not meet its primary endpoint; included here because other variants of this regimen have demonstrated comparative superiority.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 120 hours, started on Mondays
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 50 mg/m2 IV once per week (5 doses)
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
5.5-week course
Subsequent treatment
Variant #2, 225/60
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy | Toxicity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Aschele et al. 2011 (STAR-01) | Phase III (E) | Fluorouracil & RT | Seems not superior (*) | Inferior toxicity |
Note: efficacy is based on the 2016 update. This is an experimental arm that did not meet its primary endpoint; included here because other variants of this regimen have demonstrated comparative superiority.
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion for approximately 6 weeks
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 60 mg/m2 IV once per week (6 doses)
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
6-week course
Subsequent treatment
Variant #3, 250/50
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) | Phase III (E) | Fluorouracil & RT | Seems to have superior pCR rate |
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 250 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 14 days, started on day 1 (total dose per cycle: 3500 mg/m2)
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 50 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 8
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
21-day cycle for 2 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then adjuvant FOLFOX
References
- STAR-01: Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S, Pinto C, Cordio S, Rosati G, Artale S, Tagliagambe A, Ambrosini G, Rosetti P, Bonetti A, Negru ME, Tronconi MC, Luppi G, Silvano G, Corsi DC, Bochicchio AM, Chiaulon G, Gallo M, Boni L. Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR-01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jul 10;29(20):2773-80. Epub 2011 May 23. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Abstract: Carlo Aschele, Sara Lonardi, Luca Cionini, Carmine Pinto, Stefano Sergio Cordio, Gerardo Rosati, Andrea Sartore Bianchi, Angiolo Tagliagambe, Michela Frisinghelli, Vittorina Zagonel, Paola Rosetti, Maria Emanuela Negru, Andrea Bonetti, Maria Chiara Tronconi, Gabriele Luppi, Anna Rita Marsella, Domenico C. Corsi, Anna Maria Bochicchio, Nicoletta Pella, and Luca Boni. Final results of STAR-01: A randomized phase III trial comparing preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2016 34:15_suppl, 3521-3521 link to abstract
- CAO/ARO/AIO-04: Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Graeven U, Arnold D, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Sülberg H, Wittekind C, Potapov S, Staib L, Hess C, Weigang-Köhler K, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87. Epub 2012 May 23. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Update: Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Wittekind C, Ströbel P, Staib L, Wilhelm M, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R, Liersch T; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. Epub 2015 Jul 15. link to original article PubMed
- NSABP R-04: O'Connell MJ, Colangelo LH, Beart RW, Petrelli NJ, Allegra CJ, Sharif S, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Parda DS, Mohiuddin M, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori GS, Eakle J, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Wozniak TF, Roh MS, Yothers G, Wolmark N. Capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment of rectal cancer: surgical end points from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial R-04. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Jun 20;32(18):1927-34. Epub 2014 May 5. link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Allegra CJ, Yothers G, O'Connell MJ, Beart RW, Wozniak TF, Pitot HC, Shields AF, Landry JC, Ryan DP, Arora A, Evans LS, Bahary N, Soori G, Eakle JF, Robertson JM, Moore DF Jr, Mullane MR, Marchello BT, Ward PJ, Sharif S, Roh MS, Wolmark N. Neoadjuvant 5-FU or capecitabine plus radiation with or without oxaliplatin in rectal cancer patients: a phase III randomized clinical trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Sep 14;107(11). Erratum in: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016 Apr;108(4). link to original article link to PMC article PubMed
mFOLFOX6 & RT
back to top |
mFOLFOX6 & RT: modified FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin and Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Deng et al. 2016 (FOWARC) | Phase III (E) | 1. Fluorouracil, Folinic acid, RT | Superior pCR rate |
2. mFOLFOX6 | Not reported |
Chemoradiotherapy
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus once on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 48 hours (total dose per cycle: 2800 mg/m2)
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
- Concurrent radiation therapy given before or after surgery at physician discretion: 1.8 to 2.0 Gy once per day Monday through Friday for a total of 23 to 28 fractions over 5 to 6 weeks and a total dose of 46.0 to 50.4 Gy
14-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles
Subsequent treatment
- Surgery, then 6 to 8 more cycles of mFOLFOX6
References
- FOWARC: Deng Y, Chi P, Lan P, Wang L, Chen W, Cui L, Chen D, Cao J, Wei H, Peng X, Huang Z, Cai G, Zhao R, Huang Z, Xu L, Zhou H, Wei Y, Zhang H, Zheng J, Huang Y, Zhou Z, Cai Y, Kang L, Huang M, Peng J, Ren D, Wang J. Modified FOLFOX6 with or without radiation versus fluorouracil and leucovorin with radiation in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the Chinese FOWARC multicenter, open-label, randomized three-arm phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3300-7. Epub 2016 Aug 1. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Radiation therapy
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, 25 Gy
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Cedermark et al. 1997 (Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial) | Phase III (E) | Surgery alone | Superior OS |
Kapiteijn et al. 2001 | Phase III (E) | Surgery alone | Superior local recurrence rate |
Sebag-Montefiore et al. 2009 (MRC CR07; NCIC CTG CO.16) | Phase III (C) | Selective postoperative 5-FU & RT | Seems to have superior DFS |
Bujko et al. 2016 (PGBRJG0109) | Phase III (E) | 5-FU, LV, RT, +/- oxaliplatin | Seems not superior (*) |
Note: although the primary endpoint of PGBRJG0109 was negative, overall survival seemd to be superior in this arm.
Radiotherapy
- Radiation therapy, 5.0 Gy once per day for a total of 5 fractions (total dose: 25 Gy)
5-day course
Subsequent treatment
Variant #2, 40 Gy
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Oates et al. 1996 | Phase III (E) | Surgery alone | Seems to have superior DFS |
Of historic interest.
Radiotherapy
- Radiation therapy, 2.0 Gy once per day, 5 days per week, for a total of 20 fractions (total dose: 40 Gy)
4-week course
Subsequent treatment
Variant #3, 50 Gy
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Braendengen et al. 2008 (LARCS) | Phase III (C) | 5-FU, LV, RT | Seems not superior (*) |
Of historic interest. Reported efficacy is based on the 2018 update.
Radiotherapy
- Radiation therapy, 2.0 Gy once per day, 5 days per week, for a total of 25 fractions (total dose: 50 Gy)
4-week course
Subsequent treatment
References
- Oates GD, Stenning SP, Hardcastle JD; Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party. Randomised trial of surgery alone versus radiotherapy followed by surgery for potentially operable locally advanced rectal cancer. Lancet. 1996 Dec 14;348(9042):1605-10. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: Cedermark B, Dahlberg M, Glimelius B, Påhlman L, Rutqvist LE, Wilking N; Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial investigators. Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997 Apr 3;336(14):980-7. Erratum in: N Engl J Med 1997 May 22;336(21):1539. link to original article PubMed
- Update: Folkesson J, Birgisson H, Pahlman L, Cedermark B, Glimelius B, Gunnarsson U. Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial: long lasting benefits from radiotherapy on survival and local recurrence rate. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5644-50. link to original article PubMed
- Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID, Putter H, Steup WH, Wiggers T, Rutten HJ, Pahlman L, Glimelius B, van Krieken JH, Leer JW, van de Velde CJ; Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001 Aug 30;345(9):638-46. link to original article PubMed
- LARCS: Braendengen M, Tveit KM, Berglund A, Birkemeyer E, Frykholm G, Påhlman L, Wiig JN, Byström P, Bujko K, Glimelius B. Randomized phase III study comparing preoperative radiotherapy with chemoradiotherapy in nonresectable rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Aug 1;26(22):3687-94. link to original article PubMed
- Update: Brændengen M, Glimelius B. Preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer - Is survival improved? An update of the "Nordic" LARC study in non-resectable cancers. Radiother Oncol. 2018 Jun;127(3):392-395. Epub 2018 May 16. link to original article PubMed
- MRC CR07; NCIC CTG CO.16: Sebag-Montefiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, Monson J, Grieve R, Khanna S, Quirke P, Couture J, de Metz C, Myint AS, Bessell E, Griffiths G, Thompson LC, Parmar M. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG C016): a multicentre, randomised trial. Lancet. 2009 Mar 7;373(9666):811-20. link to original article link to PMC article contains protocol PubMed
- PGBRJG0109: Bujko K, Wyrwicz L, Rutkowski A, Malinowska M, Pietrzak L, Kryński J, Michalski W, Olędzki J, Kuśnierz J, Zając L, Bednarczyk M, Szczepkowski M, Tarnowski W, Kosakowska E, Zwoliński J, Winiarek M, Wiśniowska K, Partycki M, Bęczkowska K, Polkowski W, Styliński R, Wierzbicki R, Bury P, Jankiewicz M, Paprota K, Lewicka M, Ciseł B, Skórzewska M, Mielko J, Bębenek M, Maciejczyk A, Kapturkiewicz B, Dybko A, Hajac Ł, Wojnar A, Leśniak T, Zygulska J, Jantner D, Chudyba E, Zegarski W, Las-Jankowska M, Jankowski M, Kołodziejski L, Radkowski A, Żelazowska-Omiotek U, Czeremszyńska B, Kępka L, Kolb-Sielecki J, Toczko Z, Fedorowicz Z, Dziki A, Danek A, Nawrocki G, Sopyło R, Markiewicz W, Kędzierawski P, Wydmański J; Polish Colorectal Study Group. Long-course oxaliplatin-based preoperative chemoradiation versus 5 × 5 Gy and consolidation chemotherapy for cT4 or fixed cT3 rectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):834-42. Epub 2016 Feb 15. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
Adjuvant chemotherapy
Capecitabine monotherapy
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (E) | Fluorouracil | Non-inferior OS |
Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT) | Phase III (E) | Observation | Seems not superior |
Note: this is a component of a sequential treatment protocol; to our knowledge there are no references to support using it as a stand-alone treatment.
Preceding treatment
- Recktum-III: Neoadjuvant capecitabine & RT, then surgery
- SCRIPT: 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy or RT, then surgery
Chemotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 1250 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 14
21-day cycle for 5 (Rektum-III) or 8 (SCRIPT) cycles
References
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- SCRIPT: Breugom AJ, van Gijn W, Muller EW, Berglund Å, van den Broek CB, Fokstuen T, Gelderblom H, Kapiteijn E, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, Martijn H, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Nagtegaal ID, Påhlman L, Punt CJ, Putter H, Roodvoets AG, Rutten HJ, Steup WH, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ; Cooperative Investigators of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group and Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumour Adjuvant Therapy Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):696-701. Epub 2014 Dec 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Fluorouracil monotherapy
back to top |
Variant #1
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (C) | Capecitabine | Non-inferior OS |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 4 cycles
Variant #2
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) | Phase III (C) | FOLFOX | Not reported |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5, 29
4 cycles (length not specified)
References
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- CAO/ARO/AIO-04: Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Graeven U, Arnold D, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Sülberg H, Wittekind C, Potapov S, Staib L, Hess C, Weigang-Köhler K, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87. Epub 2012 May 23. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Update: Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Wittekind C, Ströbel P, Staib L, Wilhelm M, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R, Liersch T; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. Epub 2015 Jul 15. link to original article PubMed
Fluorouracil & Folinic acid
back to top |
Variant #1, 500/500
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Wolmark et al. 2000 (NSABP R-02) | Phase III (C) | Chemoradiation | Seems not superior |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, given 1 hour after leucovorin
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 500 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, given first
8-week cycle for 6 cycles
Variant #2, 1000/120 ("Nordic regimen")
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR) | Phase III (E) | Observation | Seems not superior |
Note: this is an experimental arm that did not meet its primary endpoint; included here because other variants of this regimen have been used as a standard comparator. This is a component of a sequential treatment protocol; to our knowledge there are no references to support using it as a stand-alone treatment.
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 2, given first (total dose per cycle: 1000 mg/m2)
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 60 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 2, given second (total dose per cycle: 120 mg/m2)
14-day cycle for 12 cycles
Variant #3, 1900/100
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE) | Randomized Phase II (C) | FOLFOX | Seems to have inferior DFS |
Note: this is a component of a sequential treatment protocol; to our knowledge there are no references to support using it as a stand-alone treatment.
Preceding treatment
- Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation, then TME
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 380 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5 (total dose per cycle: 1900 mg/m2)
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5 (total dose per cycle: 100 mg/m2)
28-day cycle for 4 cycles
Variant #4, 2125/100 ("Mayo regimen")
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR) | Phase III (E) | Observation | Seems not superior |
Delbaldo et al. 2015 (R98) | Phase III (C) | FOLFIRI | Seems not superior |
Note: this is an experimental arm that did not meet its primary endpoint; included here because it was eventually used to establish this regimen as a standard comparator. This is a component of a sequential treatment protocol; to our knowledge there are no references to support using it as a stand-alone treatment.
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 425 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5 (total dose per cycle: 2125 mg/m2)
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 to 5 (total dose per cycle: 100 mg/m2)
4- to 5-week cycle for 6 cycles
References
- NSABP R-02: Wolmark N, Wieand HS, Hyams DM, Colangelo L, Dimitrov NV, Romond EH, Wexler M, Prager D, Cruz AB Jr, Gordon PH, Petrelli NJ, Deutsch M, Mamounas E, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Rockette H, Fisher B. Randomized trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy for carcinoma of the rectum: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-02. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Mar 1;92(5):388-96. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- ADORE: Hong YS, Nam BH, Kim KP, Kim JE, Park SJ, Park YS, Park JO, Kim SY, Kim TY, Kim JH, Ahn JB, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim JC, Yun SH, Kim JH, Park JH, Park HC, Jung KH, Kim TW. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ADORE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1245-53. Epub 2014 Sep 4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- PROCTOR: Breugom AJ, van Gijn W, Muller EW, Berglund Å, van den Broek CB, Fokstuen T, Gelderblom H, Kapiteijn E, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, Martijn H, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Nagtegaal ID, Påhlman L, Punt CJ, Putter H, Roodvoets AG, Rutten HJ, Steup WH, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ; Cooperative Investigators of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group and Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumour Adjuvant Therapy Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):696-701. Epub 2014 Dec 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- R98: Delbaldo C, Ychou M, Zawadi A, Douillard JY, André T, Guerin-Meyer V, Rougier P, Dupuis O, Faroux R, Jouhaud A, Quinaux E, Buyse M, Piedbois P; AERO, GERCOR, FNLCC and FFCD. Postoperative irinotecan in resected stage II-III rectal cancer: final analysis of the French R98 Intergroup trial. Ann Oncol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1208-15. Epub 2015 Mar 3. link to original article PubMed
FOLFOX
back to top |
FOLFOX: FOLinic acid, Fluorouracil, OXaliplatin
Variant #1
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hong et al. 2014 (ADORE) | Randomized Phase II (E) | Fluorouracil & 5-FU | Seems to have superior DFS |
Preceding treatment
- Fluoropyrimidine-based chemoradiation, then TME
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, then 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 46 hours (total dose: 2800 mg/m2)
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 200 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 85 mg/m2 IV once on day 1
14-day cycle for 8 cycles
Variant #2
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Rödel et al. 2012 (CAO/ARO/AIO-04) | Phase III (E) | Fluorouracil | Not reported |
Note: it is unclear from the abstract whether the intent is for 8 cycles (16 doses of oxaliplatin) or 8 doses of oxaliplatin.
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 2400 mg/m2 IV continuous infusion over 48 hours twice per cycle on days 1 & 2, 15 & 16
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 400 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 15
- Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) 100 mg/m2 IV once per day on days 1 & 15
8 cycles
References
- ADORE: Hong YS, Nam BH, Kim KP, Kim JE, Park SJ, Park YS, Park JO, Kim SY, Kim TY, Kim JH, Ahn JB, Lim SB, Yu CS, Kim JC, Yun SH, Kim JH, Park JH, Park HC, Jung KH, Kim TW. Oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (ADORE): an open-label, multicentre, phase 2, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1245-53. Epub 2014 Sep 4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- CAO/ARO/AIO-04: Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Graeven U, Arnold D, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Sülberg H, Wittekind C, Potapov S, Staib L, Hess C, Weigang-Köhler K, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jul;13(7):679-87. Epub 2012 May 23. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- Update: Rödel C, Graeven U, Fietkau R, Hohenberger W, Hothorn T, Arnold D, Hofheinz RD, Ghadimi M, Wolff HA, Lang-Welzenbach M, Raab HR, Wittekind C, Ströbel P, Staib L, Wilhelm M, Grabenbauer GG, Hoffmanns H, Lindemann F, Schlenska-Lange A, Folprecht G, Sauer R, Liersch T; German Rectal Cancer Study Group. Oxaliplatin added to fluorouracil-based preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy of locally advanced rectal cancer (the German CAO/ARO/AIO-04 study): final results of the multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Aug;16(8):979-89. Epub 2015 Jul 15. link to original article PubMed
Observation
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Mittelman et al. 1985 | Phase III (C) | 5-FU & Semustine | Not reported |
5-FU, Semustine, RT | Inferior RFS | ||
RT | Not reported | ||
Glynne-Jones et al. 2014 (Chronicle) | Phase III (C) | XELOX | Seems not superior |
Sainato et al. 2014 (I-CNR-RT) | Phase III (C) | 5-FU & LV | Seems not superior |
Breugom et al. 2014 (PROCTOR) | Phase III (C) | 5-FU & LV | Seems not superior |
Breugom et al. 2014 (SCRIPT) | Phase III (C) | Capecitabine | Seems not superior |
No further treatment after (neoadjuvant therapy) and surgery.
Preceding treatment
- Mittelman et al. 1985: Surgery
- Chronicle: 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy, then surgery
- I-CNR-RT: 5-FU, LV, RT, then surgery
- PROCTOR & SCRIPT: 5-FU-based chemoradiotherapy or RT, then surgery
References
- Mittelman A, Holyoke ED, Stablein DM, Novak JW, Thomas PRM, Moertel CG, Weiland LH, Livstone EM, Bruckner HW, Knowlton AH; Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group. Prolongation of the disease-free interval in surgically treated rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1985 Jun 6;312(23):1465-72. link to original article PubMed
- Chronicle: Glynne-Jones R, Counsell N, Quirke P, Mortensen N, Maraveyas A, Meadows HM, Ledermann J, Sebag-Montefiore D. Chronicle: results of a randomised phase III trial in locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation randomising postoperative adjuvant capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) versus control. Ann Oncol. 2014 Jul;25(7):1356-62. Epub 2014 Apr 8. link to original article PubMed
- I-CNR-RT: Sainato A, Cernusco Luna Nunzia V, Valentini V, De Paoli A, Maurizi ER, Lupattelli M, Aristei C, Vidali C, Conti M, Galardi A, Ponticelli P, Friso ML, Iannone T, Osti FM, Manfredi B, Coppola M, Orlandini C, Cionini L. No benefit of adjuvant Fluorouracil Leucovorin chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced cancer of the rectum (LARC): Long term results of a randomized trial (I-CNR-RT). Radiother Oncol. 2014 Nov;113(2):223-9. Epub 2014 Nov 14. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- PROCTOR/SCRIPT: Breugom AJ, van Gijn W, Muller EW, Berglund Å, van den Broek CB, Fokstuen T, Gelderblom H, Kapiteijn E, Leer JW, Marijnen CA, Martijn H, Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg E, Nagtegaal ID, Påhlman L, Punt CJ, Putter H, Roodvoets AG, Rutten HJ, Steup WH, Glimelius B, van de Velde CJ; Cooperative Investigators of Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group and Nordic Gastrointestinal Tumour Adjuvant Therapy Group. Adjuvant chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision: a Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group (DCCG) randomized phase III trial. Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):696-701. Epub 2014 Dec 5. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
S-1 monotherapy
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC) | Phase III (E) | UFT | Seems to have superior RFS |
Note: these patients did not receive preoperative therapy.
Preceding treatment
- Curative resection for stage II or stage III rectal cancer, within 49 days
Chemotherapy
- Tegafur, gimeracil, oteracil (S-1) as follows:
- BSA less than 1.25 m2: 40 mg PO twice per day on days 1 to 28
- BSA 1.25 to 1.50 m2: 50 mg PO twice per day on days 1 to 28
- BSA 1.50 or greater m2: 60 mg PO twice per day on days 1 to 28
42-day cycles for 12 months
References
- Oki E, Murata A, Yoshida K, Maeda K, Ikejiri K, Munemoto Y, Sasaki K, Matsuda C, Kotake M, Suenaga T, Matsuda H, Emi Y, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Hamada C, Saji S, Maehara Y. A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC). Ann Oncol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1266-72. Epub 2016 Apr 7. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
UFT monotherapy
back to top |
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hamaguchi et al. 2010 (NSAS-CC) | Phase III (E) | Surgery alone | Seems to have superior OS (*) |
Oki et al. 2016 (ACTS-RC) | Phase III (C) | S-1 | Seems to have inferior RFS |
Note: these patients did not receive preoperative therapy.
Preceding treatment
- Curative resection for stage II or stage III rectal cancer, within 49 days
Chemotherapy
- Tegafur and uracil (UFT) as follows:
- BSA less than 1.25 m2: 250 mg PO twice per day on days 1 to 5
- BSA 1.25 or greater m2: 300 mg PO twice per day on days 1 to 5
7-day cycles for 12 months
References
- NSAS-CC: Hamaguchi T, Shirao K, Moriya Y, Yoshida S, Kodaira S, Ohashi Y; NSAS-CC Group. Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC). Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;67(3):587-96. Epub 2010 May 19. link to original article PubMed
- ACTS-RC: Oki E, Murata A, Yoshida K, Maeda K, Ikejiri K, Munemoto Y, Sasaki K, Matsuda C, Kotake M, Suenaga T, Matsuda H, Emi Y, Kakeji Y, Baba H, Hamada C, Saji S, Maehara Y. A randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus UFT as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II/III rectal cancer (JFMC35-C1: ACTS-RC). Ann Oncol. 2016 Jul;27(7):1266-72. Epub 2016 Apr 7. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Capecitabine, then Capecitabine & RT, then Capecitabine
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (E) | 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU | Non-inferior OS |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 1250 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 14
21-day cycle for 2 cycles, followed by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 825 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 38
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
Followed by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 1250 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 14
21-day cycle for 3 cycles
References
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 12. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Capecitabine & RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Feng et al. 2016 (CAMS_rectal cancer_01) | Phase III (C) | CapeOx & RT | Seems not superior |
Preceding treatment
Chemoradiotherapy
- Capecitabine (Xeloda) 800 mg/m2 PO twice per day on days 1 to 14
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 45 to 50.4 Gy total in 25 to 28 fractions
21-day cycle for 2 cycles
References
- CAMS_rectal cancer_01: Feng YR, Zhu Y, Liu LY, Wang WH, Wang SL, Song YW, Wang X, Tang Y, Liu YP, Ren H, Fang H, Zhang SP, Liu XF, Yu ZH, Li YX, Jin J. Interim analysis of postoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin versus capecitabine alone for pathological stage II and III rectal cancer: a randomized multicenter phase III trial. Oncotarget. 2016 May 3;7(18):25576-84. link to original article link to PMC article contains verified protocol PubMed
Fluorouracil & RT
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Fountzilas et al. 1999 | Phase III (C) | 5-FU & LV, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU & LV | Seems not superior |
Chemoradiotherapy
References
- Fountzilas G, Zisiadis A, Dafni U, Konstantaras C, Hatzitheoharis G, Liaros A, Athanassiou E, Dombros N, Dervenis C, Basdanis G, Gamvros O, Souparis A, Briasoulis E, Samantas E, Kappas A, Kosmidis P, Skarlos D, Pavlidis N. Postoperative radiation and concomitant bolus fluorouracil with or without additional chemotherapy with fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin in patients with high-risk rectal cancer: a randomized phase III study conducted by the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group. Ann Oncol. 1999 Jun;10(6):671-6. link to original article PubMed
Fluorouracil, then Fluorouracil & RT, then Fluorouracil
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Variant #1, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (450 mg/m2)
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751) | Phase III (E) | Bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | Superior OS |
Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144) | Phase III (E) | 1. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | Seems not superior |
2. CI 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU | Seems not superior |
Note: INT 864751 also included a randomization to add semustine, which is only of historic interest.
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles, followed immediately by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion while radiation is being given
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions for an initial dose of 45 Gy, which is followed by a 1.8 Gy x 3 fraction (5.4 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and adjacent lymph nodes, and then optionally a 1.8 Gy x 2 fraction (3.6 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and a 2 cm margin if the small bowel could be avoided
One course, followed 28 days later by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
Variant #2, Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2), then CI 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU (500 mg/m2)
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Hofheinz et al. 2012 (Rektum-III) | Phase III (C) | Capecitabine, then Capecitabine & RT, then Capecitabine | Non-inferior OS |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles, followed by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion while radiation is being given
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 50.4 Gy total
Followed by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
Variant #3, CI 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then CI 5-FU
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Smalley et al. 2006 (GI INT 0144) | Phase III (E) | 1. Bolus 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then Bolus 5-FU | Seems not superior |
2. Bolus 5-FU, then RT, then Bolus 5-FU | Seems not superior |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 300 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion over 42 days, started on day 1 (total dose: 12,600 mg/m2)
8-week course, followed in 2 weeks by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 225 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion while radiation is being given
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions for an initial dose of 45 Gy, which is followed by a 1.8 Gy x 3 fraction (5.4 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and adjacent lymph nodes, and then optionally a 1.8 Gy x 2 fraction (3.6 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and a 2 cm margin if the small bowel could be avoided
Followed in 28 days by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 300 mg/m2/day IV continuous infusion on days 1 to 56
56-day course
Variant #4, bolus 5-FU, then bolus 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
O'Connell et al. 1994 (INT 864751) | Phase III (C) | Bolus 5-FU, then CI 5-FU & RT, then bolus 5-FU | Inferior OS |
Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114) | Phase III (C) | 1. 5-FU & Leucovorin, then 5-FU, Leucovorin, RT, then 5-FU & Leucovorin | Seems not superior |
2. Levamisole combination #1 | Seems not superior | ||
3. Levamisole combination #2 | Seems not superior |
Note: INT 864751 also included a randomization to add semustine, which is only of historic interest.
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles, followed by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 IV bolus 3 days per week during weeks 1 & 5 of radiation, preferably within 2 hours after the day's radiation
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions for an initial dose of 45 Gy, which is followed by a 1.8 Gy x 3 fraction (5.4 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and adjacent lymph nodes, and then optionally a 1.8 Gy x 2 fraction (3.6 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and a 2 cm margin if the small bowel could be avoided
Followed in 28 days by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
References
- INT 864751: O'Connell MJ, Martenson JA, Wieand HS, Krook JE, Macdonald JS, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, Gunderson LL, Rich TA. Improving adjuvant therapy for rectal cancer by combining protracted-infusion fluorouracil with radiation therapy after curative surgery. N Engl J Med. 1994 Aug 25;331(8):502-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- GI INT 0114: Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Petroni GR, Hollis D, Cooke E, Benson AB 3rd, Cummings B, Gunderson LL, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA. Adjuvant postoperative fluorouracil-modulated chemotherapy combined with pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer: initial results of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):2030-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Tepper JE, O'Connell M, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis DR, Benson AB 3rd, Cummings B, Gunderson LL, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA, Mayer RJ. Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1744-50. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed content property of HemOnc.org
- GI INT 0144: Smalley SR, Benedetti JK, Williamson SK, Robertson JM, Estes NC, Maher T, Fisher B, Rich TA, Martenson JA, Kugler JW, Benson AB 3rd, Haller DG, Mayer RJ, Atkins JN, Cripps C, Pedersen J, Periman PO, Tanaka MS Jr, Leichman CG, Macdonald JS. Phase III trial of fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimens plus radiotherapy in postoperative adjuvant rectal cancer: GI INT 0144. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Aug 1;24(22):3542-7. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Rektum-III: Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S, Matzdorff A, Laechelt S, Hartmann JT, Müller L, Link H, Moehler M, Kettner E, Fritz E, Hieber U, Lindemann HW, Grunewald M, Kremers S, Constantin C, Hipp M, Hartung G, Gencer D, Kienle P, Burkholder I, Hochhaus A. Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012 Jun;13(6):579-88. Epub 2012 Apr 13. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
5-FU & Leucovorin, then 5-FU, Leucovorin, RT, then 5-FU & Leucovorin
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Tepper et al. 1997 (GI INT 0114) | Phase III (E) | 1. 5-FU, then 5-FU & RT, then 5-FU | Seems not superior |
2. Levamisole combination #1 | Seems not superior | ||
3. Levamisole combination #2 | Seems not superior |
Preceding treatment
Chemotherapy, part 1
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 425 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5, given second
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5, given first
28-day cycle for 2 cycles, followed by:
Chemoradiotherapy
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV bolus 4 days per week during weeks 1 & 5 of radiation, preferably within 2 hours after the day's radiation
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV bolus 4 days per week during weeks 1 & 5 of radiation, preferably within 2 hours after the day's radiation
- Concurrent radiation therapy, 1.8 Gy fractions x 25 fractions for an initial dose of 45 Gy, which is followed by a 1.8 Gy x 3 fraction (5.4 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and adjacent lymph nodes, and then optionally a 1.8 Gy x 2 fraction (3.6 Gy total) boost to the tumor bed and a 2 cm margin if the small bowel could be avoided
Followed in 28 days by:
Chemotherapy, part 2
- Fluorouracil (5-FU) 380 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
- Folinic acid (Leucovorin) 20 mg/m2 IV bolus once per day on days 1 to 5
28-day cycle for 2 cycles
References
- GI INT 0114: Tepper JE, O'Connell MJ, Petroni GR, Hollis D, Cooke E, Benson AB 3rd, Cummings B, Gunderson LL, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA. Adjuvant postoperative fluorouracil-modulated chemotherapy combined with pelvic radiation therapy for rectal cancer: initial results of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol. 1997 May;15(5):2030-9. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
- Update: Tepper JE, O'Connell M, Niedzwiecki D, Hollis DR, Benson AB 3rd, Cummings B, Gunderson LL, Macdonald JS, Martenson JA, Mayer RJ. Adjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: analysis of stage, sex, and local control--final report of intergroup 0114. J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr 1;20(7):1744-50. link to original article contains verified protocol PubMed
Radiation therapy
back to top |
RT: Radiation Therapy
Regimen
Study | Evidence | Comparator | Efficacy |
---|---|---|---|
Fisher et al. 1988 (NSABP R-01) | Phase III (E) | 1. MOF | Not reported |
2. Surgery alone | Seems not superior | ||
Krook et al. 1991 | Phase III (C) | Fluorouracil & RT | Inferior RFS |
Amott et al. 1996 | Phase III (E) | Surgery alone | Superior local recurrence rate |
Of historic interest.
Preceding treatment
Radiotherapy
- Radiation therapy, 40 to 50.4 Gy
4-week course
References
- NSABP R-01: Fisher B, Wolmark N, Rockette H, Redmond C, Deutsch M, Wickerham DL, Fisher ER, Caplan R, Jones J, Lerner H, Gordon P, Feldman M, Cruz A, Legault-Poisson S, Wexler M, Lawrence W, Robidoux A. Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation therapy for rectal cancer: results from NSABP protocol R-01. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1988 Mar 2;80(1):21-9. link to original article PubMed
- Krook JE, Moertel CG, Gunderson LL, Wieand HS, Collins RT, Beart RW, Kubista TP, Poon MA, Meyers WC, Mailliard JA, Twito DI, Morton RF, Veeder MH, Witzig TE, Cha S, Vidyarthi SC. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 1991 Mar 14;324(11):709-15. link to original article PubMed
- Amott SJ, Stenning SP, Hardcastle JD; Medical Research Council Rectal Cancer Working Party. Randomised trial of surgery alone versus surgery followed by radiotherapy for mobile cancer of the rectum. Lancet. 1996 Dec 14;348(9042):1610-4. link to original article contains protocol PubMed
- TTROG 01.014: Ngan SY, Burmeister B, Fisher RJ, Solomon M, Goldstein D, Joseph D, Ackland SP, Schache D, McClure B, McLachlan SA, McKendrick J, Leong T, Hartopeanu C, Zalcberg J, Mackay J. Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 1;30(31):3827-33. Epub 2012 Sep 24. Erratum in: J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jan 20;31(3):399. link to original article PubMed
Advanced or metastatic disease
See the colon cancer page for colorectal cancer regimens.